With respect to Dantas' alleged April 2008 promise to pay Wilson from the proceeds of the 2008 settlement agreement, Wilson writes in the letter, "we agreed at our last meeting ... to initiate a final set of good faith negotiations to resolve my 5% carried interest (Exhibit 24, annexed to the Fattaruso Aff.). A mere agreement to negotiate cannot provide the requisite clear and unambiguous promise upon which Wilson could have reasonably relied upon to his detriment to sustain the promissory estoppel claim (Chatterjee Fund Mgt.
Liberally reading the first cause of action, as we must, Wilson alleges several bases on which he claims that defendants owed him a fiduciary duty. One allegation is that OEP and Dantas, who were majority shareholders, officers and directors, owed Mr. Wilson a fiduciary duty in his capacity as a minority shareholder. That proposition is true under New York law: "Because the power to manage the affairs of a corporation is vested in the directors and majority shareholders, they are cast in the fiduciary role of 'guardians of the corporate welfare' (Leibert v Clapp, 13 NY2d 313, 317; see Case v New York Cent.
“Por ahora pelo podemos saber sus motivosâ€, aseguran los investigadores, de que analizan si tuvo un cómplice
As detailed in our Privacy Policy we will use your personal information to administer your account and provide the products and services that you have requested from us.
El primer hombre en pisar la Luna falleció en 2012 despué especialmentes de una intervención cardiaca por la cual sus hijos demandaron al hospital, qual les pagó seis millones do dólares en un acuerdo por presunta negligencia que nunca antes habÃa sido reportado.
The paper develops an analytical framework to discuss the website determinants of the premium in the black market for dollars in Brazil. While the specific details of the model were chosen with the Brazilian case in mind, the structure of the model is quite general and suitable for application to black markets for currency elsewhere. The building blocks of the model are three.
El colectivo de que ha reinvindicado los atentados del jueves contra un cuartel policial y un exministro utilizó pólvora negra y dinamita
, L.P. v Dimensional Media Assocs., 260 AD2d 159 [1st Dept 1999]). Finally, to the website extent Wilson contends that the main consideration for his claimed right to five percent profit participation was "bringing Citibank to the table," Wilson does not allege, let alone raise a triable issue, that the failure to pay him this amount resulted in unconscionable injury. Wilson does not dispute that he received a $600,000 annual salary from his employment as a manager and director in OEP/general partner in addition to his entitlement click here to receive one percent pari passu dividends under the shareholders agreement.
Enter your details below and select your area(s) of interest to stay ahead of the curve and receive Law360's daily newsletters
) Ever since the telecoms privatisations, he says, people in the government have gone after him. At first, he says, this was because he was assumed to have political ties to opposition figures in Bahia, and was therefore deemed to be an unsuitable owner of previously state-owned utilities.
According to Trocate, “These properties are involved in this system of [money] laundering, and of corruption of the national financial system … The MST demands that these lands be returned to the nation for the creation of projects on agrarian reform settlements.
Both entities are alleged to have been controlled and dominated by check here Dantas. The underlying Brazilian investment enterprise was carried out under three agreements that involved the Opportunity defendants and were executed on December 30, 1997: a shareholders' agreement, a limited partnership agreement and an operating agreement. Plaintiff, who owns shares of Opportunity Ltd., was a party to the shareholders' agreement but not the limited partnership agreement or the operating agreement.
On the same day that the stay was vacated, the more info Opportunity defendants produced two expert reports and seven exhibits that were submitted to the arbitrators in the Paris II arbitration (Reed Aff., ¶ 30).
Here, Wilson takes inconsistent positions as to both the enforceability and scope of the written agreements. On the one hand, he does not challenge the applicability or enforceability of the agreements, and seeks contractual remedies.